Showing posts with label Labor Force. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Labor Force. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 3, 2020

UNEMPLOYMENT IN MAY | BLS Release Due Friday, June 5

June 3, 2020—On April 26, President Trump's economic adviser, Kevin Hassett, said that the U.S. unemployment rate will approach levels that occurred in the Great Depression. The Bureau of Labor Statistics releases the unemployment rate for May on Friday morning, June 5.

What was the peak unemployment rate during the Great Depression? It was approximately 26 percent in the second quarter of 1933—after the NBER reports that the formally defined Depression was over, as shown in the shaded area in the FRED chart below, covering the years from the second half of 1929 to the end of 1942.












Source: St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank, FRED chart, Unemployment rate, 1929-1942.

So how and when will we know whether this is a Second Great Depression or a Second Great Recession? One way is to watch the payroll numbers and ADP has reported a drop of 2.8 million jobs in May. That would ordinarily be a big shock, but when analysts were expecting a loss of more than 8 million jobs, it is a relief.

Mark Zandi of Moody's Analytics went so far as to say that the Covid-19 Recession is already over barring serious policy errors or a "second wave" of the virus. He also warned that recovery will be slow.

One problem with the numbers that are being reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) is that many workers believe they will get their jobs back when commercial enterprises are reopened. They are not working but are not looking for work while the pandemic is still in place.

Just to review how the BLS does its work: It contracts with the Census Bureau to do a monthly national phone survey. The Census Bureau asks someone in each surveyed household how many people are employed and how many are unemployed, i.e., not working and looking for work. The two numbers together are called the "workforce." The unemployment rate is the number of unemployed divided by the workforce. Although the sample is approximately 50,000 households per month, the surveyed population is a scientific sample to represent the nation and the numbers are extrapolated to counties and the nation.

We can despair of the numbers or look more closely at the range of unemployment numbers that the BLS now reports, as shown in the chart below covering the data through April 2020. These numbers provide information on how long people have been unemployed and whether some people are omitted because they have left the workforce for retirement, for care of children or seniors or disabled family members, or for study. (The current recession is being called a "Shecession" because so many female workers need to stay home from work to care for their children in Covid-19 conditions when schools are closed and using paid child care becomes more risky.)

Measure
Apr.
2019
Dec.
2019
Jan.
2020
Feb.
2020
Mar.
2020
Apr.
2020
U-1 Persons unemployed 15 weeks or longer, as a percent of the civilian labor force
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.1
U-2 Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs, as a percent of the civilian labor force
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.7
2.4
13.2
U-3 Total unemployed, as a percent of the civilian labor force (official unemployment rate)
3.6
3.5
3.6
3.5
4.4
14.7
U-4 Total unemployed plus discouraged workers, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus discouraged workers
3.9
3.7
3.8
3.8
4.7
15.1
U-5 Total unemployed, plus discouraged workers, plus all other persons marginally attached to the labor force, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force
4.5
4.2
4.4
4.4
5.2
16.0
U-6 Total unemployed, plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force, plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force
7.3
6.7
6.9
7.0
8.7
22.8
Source: BLS, release of May 7, 2020.

Some of those who believe they are only temporarily unemployed will actually not find their job waiting for them. Their employer may not be able to weather the period of closure. New announcements appear daily of retailers and restaurants and drinking places that will not reopen. At the end of the Payroll Protection Plan (PPP), which is keeping some workers off the unemployment rolls, will the employer still be there, and ready to keep everyone on the payroll, or will post-Covid business reorganizations mean there will fewer customers or different employee needs? (The PPP was originally passed for eight weeks and today the House-passed bill to extend PPP to 24 weeks was passed by the Senate.)

The PPP is an approximation of the German Kurzarbeit (short-time working), which subsidizes up to 60 percent of salaries (67 percent for workers with dependent children) if employers maintain their payrolls in a recession or a drop in sales. The German subsidy does not require a special authorization; it is an automatic stabilizer. The program has spread to 20 percent of the German workforce, is considered highly successful and has been copied in at least six other European countries.

If we use the official unemployment number, U-3, April showed a rate of 14.7 percent. If we pay more attention to U-6, the unemployment rate in April was 22.8 percent.

What will the May unemployment number look like? The official U-3 rate may be kept lower by retirements, according to an April study, but the April U-3 number was more than 8 percentage points higher than the study predicted.

(Hat tip to Dr. Jurgen Brauer and Geoffrey Hilton for reviewing this post and making suggestions.)

Friday, January 8, 2016

JOBS | U.S. Boom Amidst Global Gloom

U.S. Job Growth Higher in December,
Unemployment still 5%. But will weak
 demand from overseas be exacerbated
 by a stronger dollar?
The just-released BLS jobs report for December [link is to the BLS News Release] shows payrolls rose by 292,000 in December. The good news will be much appreciated as Asia and Europe suffer from slack demand and pessimism.

Upward revisions for October and November reinforced the labor market strength in December, producing an average growth of 284,000 over the last three months, up from an average of 221,000 per month for the full year 2015.

Economists Underestimated December Growth. A Reuters survey of economists released an hour before the BLS data showed an average expected growth figure of approximately 200,000 new jobs.

With the upward revisions in the prior two months, that number was way off. Reuters should probably stop publishing predictions that will be contradicted within an hour. (How useful are they, really? To users and to those involved in the exercise?)

The U.S. "Misery Index" Is a Tiny 5.4 percent. We should be so happy. The unemployment rate in December was 5.0 percent for the third month in a row as inflation remains low– the November Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) rose only 0.4 percentage point, seasonally adjusted, compared with November 2014.

Industry Detail. Professional and business services added 73,000 jobs in December, with nearly half the gain from growth in temporary help services, which rose 34,000. In 2015, employment in professional and business services increased by an average of 50,000 per month, not much below the 59,000-a-month figure in the strong year 2014.

Construction showed strong job growth for the third consecutive month. Health care also continued to add jobs in December and showed an even stronger year in 2015 than the year before. Employment in food services and drinking places increased by 37,000 in December, another bright spot.

Motion picture and sound recording industries added 15,000 jobs in December, offsetting a decline
in the previous month. Employment rose among couriers and messengers. Other sectors changed little.

Labor Market. Among people who were neither working nor looking for work in December, 1.8 million were classified as marginally attached to the labor force, down from 2.3 million a year earlier. The number of discouraged workers, a subset of the "marginally attached" who believed that no jobs were available for them, was 663,000 in December, little different from a year earlier.

The labor force participation rate, at 62.6 percent, has shown little change in recent months. The employment-population ratio, at 59.5 percent, has also changed little. The BLS has published a little noted article in December by Steven F. Hipple on the drop in the U.S. labor force participation rate since 2000. BLS counts people who are neither working nor looking for work as “not in the labor force.”  From 2004 to 2014, the percentage of such people has increased, reducing the labor force participation rate. Data from the Current Population Survey (CPS) and its Annual Social and Economic Supplement (ASEC) provide some insight into why people are not in the labor force. In the ASEC, people who did not work at all in the previous year are asked to give the main reason they did not work.

Interviewers categorize survey participants’ verbatim responses into the following six categories:

  • ill health or disabled; 
  • retired; 
  • home responsibilities; 
  • going to school;
  • could not find work; and 
  • other reasons. 
A quick summary of Hipple's article is: Between 2004 and 2014, all of these factors came into play, and a single factor goes a long way toward explaining what is happening–the aging of the work force. More workers are becoming disabled or retiring, at the same time as workers withdrawing from the labor force continue to cite the other reasons.

Friday, October 7, 2011

BLS | Proposed New U7, Underemployment–Worsens in September

Payroll jobs grew by 103,000 in September, but a big portion of this is 45,000 Verizon strikers returning to work. Better news is the upward revision in payrolls for July and August of 99,000 jobs. Private payroll jobs grew by 137,000 in September, offset by a 34,000-job decline in government employment, entirely accounted for by 35,000 cuts by local-governments. What’s going to happen to government jobs when the deficit-reduction Supercommittee reports next month and recommends significant new cuts in federal spending? Remember, Congress is supposed to vote up down as with the base-closing commission.

The household survey from the BLS does not give much relief from this bleak picture. The U.S. unemployment rate (U3) was stuck again at 9.1 percent, but if we add the percentage of the labor force that is underemployed – i.e., involuntarily employed part-time – this measure of unemployment rose by 0.3 of a percentage point, i.e., from 14.8 percent to 15.1 percent. This unofficial number strikes me as useful. We could call it U7. See the last line of the table below.

The problem with the official BLS broad measures of unemployment (U4, U5, U6) shown below is that monthly changes in these numbers may be misleading because they include components that are not seasonally adjusted. The slight improvement in the rate of the marginally attached (U5), which includes discouraged (U4), could reflect seasonal factors.

The unemployment + underemployment number (what I call U7) can be compared on a monthly basis because both components are seasonally adjusted.


Sept. 2011
Aug. 2011
Unemployment Rate % (U3)
9.1
9.1
Labor Force (mil.)
153.6
154.0
Unemployed (mil.)
14.0
14.0
Teenagers %
24.6
25.4
Blacks %
16.0
16.7
Long-term unemployed/unemployed %
44.6
42.9
Discouraged* %
0.6
0.6
Unemployed+discouraged* % (U4)
9.7
9.8
Marginally attached* %
1.7
1.7
Unemployed + marg. att.* % (U5)
10.7
10.8
Involuntary part-time %
6.0
5.7
Unemployed + marg.-att.*+invol-PT % (U6)
16.8
16.5
Unemployed + invol-PT % (proposed U7)
15.1
14.8
*Not seasonally adjusted. Marginally attached includes discouraged workers. Denominator in all cases but the LT unemployed is the labor force or (for U4, U5 and U6) a combination of the labor force and the portion of the  marginally attached in the numerator. The U4 rate changes because of rounding. The other numbers shown are seasonally adjusted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Source: www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf. The official broad unemployment and underemployment rates (U4, U5, U6) are discussed at http://www.bls.gov/fls/flscomparelf/unemployment.htm#table1_2.