Showing posts with label floods. Show all posts
Showing posts with label floods. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 10, 2015

CITYECONOMIST | 150K Page Views–Top Posts


Milestone for CityEconomist
In 30 days, CityEconomist has attracted 10K Page Views, a rate of 120K/year. Thank you for reading.

Top 10 Posts (150K Page Views)


How the Clinton Health Care Plan Was Killed Jan 31, 2009 + 5 comments





Which David Brooks Should We Listen To? Oct 24, 2014 + 4 comments


BBC Panorama on U.S. Health Care Jan 25, 2009 + 3 comments



Most-Viewed Posts During Last 30 Days (10K Views)








Wednesday, December 19, 2012

NYC | Landfill Idea a Mistake?

I have heard it several places - the map of part of Manhattan that was not flooded by Sandy looks a lot like the Manhattan Island that Peter Stuyvesant et al. colonized.

The implication is that the landfill approach was a mistake. So the World Trade Center was taken down from above by terrorists and its landfill has been overrun by Sandy's surge. The two disasters are often linked but not quite in this way.

Now the implication has been posted as a comment on an article on Dutch responses to flooding in Crain's. The article is behind a subscription wall but the comment is not:
  wrote on The Dutch are already building houses that float and are attached to the ground (the seabed-to-be) by anchors. We have a LOT more land here, and can afford to let large amounts of it revert to its natural state.  We'd better start building reefs for oyster beds and planting marsh plants in low-lying areas of New York now rather than waiting for another Sandy, because there will be, not one, but many.  Like it or not, New York is going to return to the boundaries it had in the 1600s, pre-landfill, no point in spending a lot of money and labor trying to deny it. Read more: http://bit.ly/1Or8kCV (limited access).
One reason that the Dutch were over here in the first place is that floods had been taking place in Holland and Belgium and they were looking for places to relocate their people.