Showing posts with label Comptroller DiNapoli. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Comptroller DiNapoli. Show all posts

Thursday, August 13, 2015

NYC | Subways Slower–Best and Worst Lines

Three of the five worst subway lines in NYC for delays in 2014 are the 4, 5
and 6 lines on the East Side.
I have previously posted asking whether Uber has created more congestion in New York City by putting more cars for hire on the city streets. That idea has since resonated among some readers and city officials.

The Straphangers Campaign has meanwhile since the 1970s been rating NYC's subways. Now State Comptroller Tom DiNapoli is doing his own research.

He found that the percentage of on-time trains during the week fell from 80.5 percent in 2013 (using a fiscal year ending in March) to 74 percent in 2014.

The Worst Five Subway Lines
4 - 49.2% on time (FEWER THAN HALF OF THE TRAINS WERE ON TIME)
5 - 51.1%
2 - 51.2%
F - 66.1%
6 - 66.9%
Three of these lines - the 4, 5, and 6 - connect the Upper East Side with Wall Street.

The Best Five Subway Lines
L - 93.7% on time
J/Z - 92.1%
C - 88.9%
R - 88.7%
7 - 88.2%

Sunday, July 26, 2015

PSEG | NY State Comptroller Slams PSC on LIPA-PSEG

PSEG's M.O. is to put up huge poles in a hurry, then
say it's so sorry it didn't know about local laws relating
to scarring the landscape. Now it wants a rate increase.
The cover of Friday's Newsday was headlined "NY Comptroller Report: LIPA Reform Hurt Customers".

Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli said ratepayers are facing higher bills, less transparency, more debt and less oversight.

DiNapoli's report drew expected responses defending the record of the Long Island Power Authority:
  • The NY Department of Public Service (DPS) said later than day that DiNapoli was "simply wrong", citing a three-year rate freeze and "unprecedented" oversight. DPS said the 2013 reform was a "success".
  • PSEG, which operates LIPA's power delivery, said reliability, storm response, call center and other measures have improved on its watch. 
  • LIPA spokesman Sid Nathan said the Authority had been ordered to bring "the most efficient and lowest-cost service to customers."
Local officials on Long Island sided with DiNapoli:
  • Assemb. Fred Thiele (I-Sag Harbor) applauded the report, calling the DPS idea that the reform was a success "ludicrous". "We are facing a substantial rate increase that Long Islanders can't afford. DPS has ... totally lost public confidence."
  • Brookhaven Supervisor Edward Romaine said he was glad the comptroller focused scrutiny on the LIPA-PSEG rate hike, calling for "an audit from the state comptroller so we get accurate numbers and an independent review".
  • George Maragos, Nassau County's comptroller, agreed with DiNapoli's critique of the PSEG- LIPA contract, including its attempt to stop DiNapoli from scrutinizing contracts. He said: "The agreement between the state and PSEG has to be rethought and more controls put in place."
Jennifer Freeman, a spokeswoman for DiNapoli, said, "We'll let LIPA ratepayers judge whether the latest reforms are working or not."

Comment

When I worked for the NYC Comptroller's Office as Chief Economist in 1992-2006, I testified several times for the Comptroller on behalf of electricity consumers against rate increases for Con Ed and a proposed merger. Our intervention turned out to be on the winning side in all cases. It is good to know that Comptroller DiNapoli is putting the power of his office behind protecting the Long Island consumer of power.

My experience with PSEG on Long Island does not give me confidence that PSEG is being honest with the communities that it has agreed to serve. It has erected huge toxic poles (see photo above) in defiance, or ignorance, of local laws and precedents. Burying the lines would make electric power more storm-resistant and would not mar the landscape or poison the water.

It has a history of claiming not to have known that there were local laws requiring environmental impact statements and local planning filings for new poles, followed by earnest promises that next time it will be more respectful of community laws and regulations.

Communities are faced with the expense of taking down the poles after they have been erected, instead of being offered the option of contributing to burying them, as Southampton agreed to do.