Showing posts with label Heidi Fiske. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Heidi Fiske. Show all posts

Sunday, November 1, 2020

STATE RACES, RED TO BLUE | Heidi's Picks

Sunday, November 1—As Election Day (Tuesday) approaches, the Battleground States are getting special attention. See two takes on a Biden or Trump victory in these states.  (More recently: CNN's guess on the likely range in the Electoral College vote and the American Prospect's "Unsanitized" roundup.)

The following summary of key down-ballot state races was sent to me by Heidi Fiske, who asked me to post it on her behalf, as I have done before:

Nothing is more important than winning the Presidency and taking back the Senate.


But those races are attracting huge sums of money. Not so the state races, which both require and attract less money. 


We will realize in January just how important these overlooked races are, because that’s when governors, state AGs, state Secretaries of State, state judges and state legislatures will determine the district lines that will hold for a decade, through 2030, based on this year's foreshortened census. 


The Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee (DLCC), the Democratic body that concerns itself with state races, says that if the 48 state legislative candidates in the links below are elected, they will flip 10 chambers in seven critical states from Red to Blue. Of these seats, 34 are in chambers that will rule on district lines for one-third of all House seats (144 of 435).

  • Heidi's Picks incorporates recommendations of the DLCC, Future Now, and some other individuals and groups.
  • Arizona, 5 legislative candidates
  • Iowa, 4 legislative candidates
  • Michigan, 4 legislative candidates
  • Minnesota, 2 legislative candidates
  • North Carolina, 11 legislative  + Attorney General + Secretary of State + 2 Supreme Court candidates  [NC’s superb governor is not included only because he is well-funded and almost certain to win]
  • Pennsylvania, 13 legislative candidates [PA’s outstanding Attorney General is not included only because he is considered sure to win]
  • Texas, 9 legislative + 4 Supreme Court

Monday, July 2, 2018

HEIDI FISKE | Mexico Ready to Embrace China?

Lopéz Obrador, Mexico's Newly 
Elected President
The following story originated from our Mexico tracker, Heidi Fiske:

Trump's plan to alienate the neighbors and friends of the United States is bearing fruit.

This blogpost, written by Heidi Fiske, expressed our alarm about the case of Mexico. Our concerns were justified. The country is reacting as one might expect, turning to other nations to seek help.

Until now, Mexican leaders have been wary of involving China in their country’s affairs for fear of angering the United States. 

Not any more. Its just-elected socialist president Andrés Manuel López Obrador plans a range of infrastructure projects in the poverty-stricken south of Mexico in which he grew up.

Many of these projects are expected to be financed with Chinese loans. We are watching this evolving story.

Tuesday, April 24, 2018

VIEWS | 400K – Top Posts in April

This blog just passed 400,000 Page Views.
Thank you for reading!
The most-viewed posts in April 2018 are listed below.

Top Ten Posts in April 2018
WW2 | D-Day+70 Data May 10, 2014

Tuesday, March 6, 2018

HEIDI FISKE | Mexico – A Vector for Chinese Aggression? (Post 2 of 2)

President Enrique Peña Nieto of Mexico (L) and
President Xi Jinping of China, September 2017.
This is Part 2 of a two-part guest post by Heidi S. Fiske. The first post is here. 

Aggression by a foreign power, using a Latin American base, brought America to the verge of nuclear war in 1962.

The Cuban Missile Crisis

Seared into the memory of all who lived through it, 56 years ago the United States came within a hair’s breadth of nuclear war with Russia. It was so close, in fact, that, on October 27, 1962, then Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara declared: “This may be the last Saturday I ever see.”

It began on October 14, 1962, when a US plane spotted a Soviet missile being assembled on the island of Cuba. President Kennedy convened a very small team to consider what to do. Invade? Bomb? 

He decided on an embargo, hoping to keep Russian warheads from reaching the island (fruitlessly, we later learned – the Russians already had 162 tactical and strategic nuclear warheads there). On October 22, a tense American public listened as Kennedy announced the blockade on television, and said that the United States was prepared to use military force to protect its security. After another fevered week of negotiations, the Soviets backed down and removed the missiles.

But let’s consider what our position would be today if a hostile power had major bases in Mexico.

A Weakened United States and a Strong Mexico

Cuba is a small island 90 miles to our south. It was and is poor. We had robust international alliances all over the world. Our national debt was $298 billion, less than 10 percent of our GDP. While the Cold War was expensive, we were not engaged in any hot war. President Kennedy was schooled in history, hard-working and a very bright man with an outstanding cabinet.

By contrast, Mexico is the 15th largest economy in the world. It is smack up against us for 2,000 miles, and has territorial waters that abut ours in the Gulf of Mexico and the Pacific. And we have a different sort of President now, presiding over a cabinet whose divisions and shortcomings are legendary. Our national debt is $20 trillion, 106 percent of GDP – before the new tax reductions and budget take effect.

Thus if we found ourselves facing Chinese aggression via Mexico, we would be weaker than we were in 1962. And China would have far more territory, much closer to us, from which to launch a cyber or military attack.

How likely is it that China might gain a military foothold in Mexico? The camel’s nose is its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).

Belt and Road

China’s BRI may be the largest international investment project in history. Xi Jinping announced its two parts in the fall of 2013 – the land-based Silk Road Economic Belt (SREB), and the sea-based Maritime Silk Road (MSR). 

The BRI goal is to create infrastructure that connects developing countries. Less than five years old, it already covers more than 68 countries, equivalent to 65 percent of the world's population and 40 percent of global GDP.

This may be a peculiarly Chinese way to seek influence. In On China, Henry Kissinger points to the stunning fact that, for 18 of the past 20 centuries, China had the highest GDP in the world. Its  superb communications and roads linked markets among its vast population and territory. BRI is just such an initiative, this time on the world stage.

Today, add China’s growing pre-eminence in AI and other key technologies to the mix, and its increasing use of authoritarian power to curtail what its citizens can see. “Technology in the service of an authoritarian regime is a very very dangerous thing,” says Robert Kaplan, author of the just-released The Return of Marco Polo’s World, which looks, among other things, at BRI.

While BRI was originally designed to foster economic cooperation with developing countries in Eurasia and Africa, last May it was extended to Latin America. In January 2018, China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi traveled to the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) Forum in Santiago and formally invited the 33 nations represented there to join forces. CELAC, formed in 2011, does not include the United States or Canada. Pointedly, Chile’s Foreign Minister Heraldo Muñoz used the occasion to say that “This meeting represents a categoric repudiation of protectionism and unilateralism.”

China had already become the most significant new force in Latin America and the Caribbean. At the World Economic Forum in 2017, Angel Melguizo, Chief Economist in the Latin American Unit, OECD Development Centre, noted:
“China has become one of Latin America’s key trading partners. In fact, it is the most important partner for Brazil, Chile and Peru. Trade between China and Latin America has multiplied 22 times since 2000, a stark contrast to Latin American trade with the United States and Europe, which merely doubled in the same time period.” 
The scale of potential BRI projects is indicated by a proposed 19,000-kilometer trans-Pacific fiber-optic internet cable from China to Chile.

Though wary of China’s growing role in this hemisphere, the United States seems strangely insouciant about it, with Trump now exercising what Council on Foreign Relations President Richard Haass wryly dubs “the Withdrawal Doctrine.”

To be sure, US-Mexican ties run deep and broad. There is a long history of friendship, cross-border businesses, and alliances. Many families on both sides of the border, at all socio-economic levels, are bi-national. And we share some important history and cultural roots, especially in the southwest.

But will this be enough to counter a Chinese juggernaut patiently building in Latin America? “Washington,” says Antonio Hsiang, Professor and Director of the Center for Latin American Economy and Trade Studies at Chihlee University of Technology, Taiwan. “is now in danger of damaging its core interests through neglect.”

Looking Down the New Silk Road

BRI is supposedly peaceful in intent. At his talk to the CELAC Forum, Foreign Minister Wang said:
“China will always stay committed to the path of peaceful development and the win-win strategy of opening up, and stands ready to share development dividends with all countries.”
But this is spoken by a top official of the country that is building military bases in territory it does not own, in the South China Sea. How difficult would it be to convert major infrastructure installations in Mexico into bases for spying, cyber attacks or even a hot war against us?

This is the real menace from Mexico. And it means that Trump’s attacks on Mexico are 180 degrees away from what strategic considerations would dictate.

HEIDI FISKE | Risks Created by Trump's Trashing Mexico (Post 1 of 2)

Mexico's President Enrique Peña Nieto with China's President
Xi Jinping, September 2017.
The following guest post was written for CityEconomist by Heidi S. Fiske.

There is a looming menace from Mexico, but it is none of the ones identified by Trump. The threat is not one of drug dealers, rapists, and murderers flooding across our borders. It is not MS 13. It is not jobs lost to Mexican workers or Mexican factories or Mexican steel.

They are flyspecks compared with the real danger that Trump is creating by his relentless insults, as well as his threats to NAFTA, his proposed tariffs, his cancelling of DACA, and his insistence that Mexico pay for a border wall. And to add insult to injury, he has just announced his plan to send Jared Kushner (who just lost his White House security clearance) to Mexico tomorrow to meet with President Enrique Peña Nieto.

The real menace is the strategic threat to our security that an emboldened China may pose, using an alienated Mexico as its base.

China has recently, sweepingly, broadened its Latin American ties. And just as it has gotten stronger on the world stage and filled some of the vacuum created by Trump’s unilateralism, it has not, as the US hoped, gotten more democratic. On the contrary, it has tightened authoritarian control, flexing new muscle against foreign enterprises on its soil, and forcing western news outlets to limit what Chinese citizens can see. Most strikingly, on February 25, China's Premier Xi Jinping arrogated the power to rule for life by abolishing the two-term limit that had been the law. The National People’s Congress is expected to rubber stamp his decision this week.

Does China as a major force in Mexico sound unlikely? To be sure, it will not happen fast. But a look at the history of aggression from the south, and of China’s recent moves, shows that it is a geopolitical threat of such potential magnitude that we should be vigorously working to counter it now.

“Bad Uncle Sam”

But Trump is doing the opposite, and thereby encouraging Mexico to turn away from the United States, however reluctantly. His insistence that Mexico pay for the wall, for instance, has caused Peña Nieto to cancel two trips to the United States, most recently last month.

And on March 1, career diplomat Roberta Jacobson, our highly respected ambassador to Mexico, announced she would quit in May. As Trump has not even proposed a candidate for Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs, her departure leaves us particularly depleted in Latin American diplomacy on the highest levels.

To be sure, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson has recently made a five-country tour of Latin America to try to placate leaders there, but with limited success. “This is a way for Tillerson to say, ‘We’re elevating our voice,’” said Rafael Fernández de Castro, the director of the Center for US-Mexican Studies at the University of California San Diego. But, “this is the ‘bad Uncle Sam’ of the past,” he added. “The horrendous insults to Mexicans, to every single Latin American immigrant, are there. They cannot have it both ways.”

The Trump Shock and Mexican Response

Reportedly much of retiring Ambassador Jacobson’s time has had to be spent smoothing ruffled feathers rather than accomplishing substantive gains in Mexico.

“With his tweets Trump has torn up 20 years of good relations,” said a Mexican friend as we drank afternoon tea in her kitchen a year ago. “It is as if your gentle father suddenly slapped you across the face for no reason. You don’t leave the family but you are certainly wary, and waiting to see what happens next.”

What has happened since is, if anything, worse. Last week I checked in with Warren Hardy, an American who became a Mexican citizen in 1990. Beginners at his Spanish language school in San Miguel de Allende are treated to an hour-long history lesson designed to impress on them that Mexicans are inordinately sensitive to being insulted. Mexicans, he explains, have great pride in their indigenous cultures on the one hand, but have been brutally treated successively by the Aztecs, Spanish and most recently the US on the other. The result is that “the core value of the Mexican people is respect. Mexicans demand respect from each other and particularly from foreigners.  What Mr. Trump has done is strike a blow at the heart of our relationship by calling Mexicans rapists and criminals."

Small wonder that Mexico’s leaders are looking for new partners. When Trump renewed his threat to scrap NAFTA late last August, slamming Mexico in the process, the very next week Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto travelled to China to discuss increased trade. While there, he participated with 800 business leaders  in a summit of the BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa), which Mexico might join to cooperate on investment, trade, finance, and the sea.  And the day after that Peña Nieto visited the Alibaba Group, hoping to get more Mexican products onto this China-based leading e-commerce platform.

Could increased trade with China morph into Mexicans being receptive to becoming a base for aggression against the United States? Consider events a century ago.

The Zimmermann Telegram

In January 1917, Germany’s Foreign Office proposed to the Mexican government that, if the US entered World War I against Germany, the Mexicans should fight on the German side, thus making it a two-front war for the US. In return, Germany would recover Arizona, Texas, and New Mexico for Mexico.

The famous Zimmermann Telegram that conveyed this offer was intercepted and decoded by British intelligence, which shared it with America in March of 1917. It backfired mightily on the Germans. So enraged was the American public that President Wilson went before Congress and swiftly won a declaration of war against Germany on April 6, 1917.

As it happened, Mexico turned Germany down, not believing that it could deliver either financially or militarily on its promise, or that Mexico could control the large English-speaking territories it might have re-acquired. But there was fertile ground among Mexicans to accept an offer that promised revenge on the United States, just as there is today. It was not just because the United States had seized almost half of Mexico in the Nineteenth Century. The United States had invaded Mexico in 1914 to protect US business interests during the Mexican revolution, and again in 1916-17 in a vain attempt to punish Pancho Villa for killing Americans in New Mexico.

While this German effort fizzled, 45 years later, a military threat from the south, from Cuba, became very real indeed.

In my next post, following shortly, we examine that threat, how much worse it would be if it were repeated today, and just how China is moving into Latin America.

This is Post 1 of 2. The second post is here:
https://cityeconomist.blogspot.com/2018/03/heidi-fiske-mexico-vector-for-chinese.html

Monday, October 17, 2016

BLOG VIEWS | 280K – Top Posts for CityEconomist

The CityEconomist blogsite just passed 280,000 page views.

Thank you for reading.

Please comment!

Here are the most viewed posts during the last month and since the inception of this blog ten years ago, in 2006.

MOST VIEWED POSTS in Oct 2016
GOVT REVENUE | License Plate Auctions
Oct 9, 2016
CAMPAIGN$ | Dem Home Stretch for Senate–Heidi's Tips
Oct 13, 2016
DONALD TRUMP | Why Did He Run as a Republican?
Jul 25, 2016
2 comments
ED BIZ | Manager-Sharing, Long Island, N.Y.
Jul 31, 2016
GUTENBERG | Aug. 24–Bible First Published
Aug 24, 2016
BLOG VIEWS | 260K – Top Posts
Jun 10, 2016
FOOD BIZ | Rhinebeck, Gigi Trattoria (Update June ...
Jun 16, 2016
FOOD BIZ | Rhinebeck, The Local Restaurant (Update...
Jun 15, 2016
DODD-FRANK | Maloney Asks Five Agencies for Data
Aug 30, 2016
SENIORS | Most Livable Cities
Aug 8, 2016

Thursday, October 13, 2016

CAMPAIGN$ | Dem Home Stretch for Senate–Heidi's List (Updated Oct. 25, 2016)

Joe Biden warns: The White House is
 not enough.
“If we win the White House and fail to take the Senate, it’s a Pyrrhic victory”–VP Joe Biden, New York City, June 2016

How to Help Democrats 
Win the Senate
 (Updated Oct 20, 2016)

Home-Stretch Tips from 
Guest-Blogger Heidi Fiske 

In the next few years, four Supreme Court justices are likely to retire. As Mitch McConnell has shown us, the Senate can drag its feet indefinitely on confirming a new justice. 

It is essential that Democrats regain control of the Senate. Supporting these candidates, therefore, is more important than almost any race specific to your district.

This year 2016 is an especially good one to try. Democrats will need to gain just 4-5 new seats, while holding the ones they have, to take control, because many more Republicans than Democrats are up for re-election. 

Despite this potential advantage, key races are very very close. On October 11, the NY Times “Upshot” called control of the Senate a 50-50 proposition.  

Each side is fighting hard. Republicans  -- shying away from Trump -- are pouring money and, increasingly, people on the ground into these races. In Missouri, for instance, Democratic candidate Jason Kander announced October 11 that a Republican SuperPac has purportedly already talked to one million Missouri voters in person or on the phone.  


But exhilaratingly, on October 18, the Clinton campaign began transferring $6 million to state parties in seven purple states to help Get Out The Vote for down ballot candidates,  and began putting new resources into red states like Arizona, Missouri and Indiana in an effort to win a landslide. And, according to Politico, Democrats will badly outspend Republicans on TV ads in the eight most competitive Senate races: $81 million versus just $65 million for the GOP.


Democrats need to fight the new GOP push with money and on-the-ground volunteers. 
This memo is written to help you figure out how to do that. It was written by Heidi Fiske 
for posting here. Please send comments and updates to her at heidifi33 [at] aol [dot] com.

What Not to Do
  1. Don’t waste your $ and time on California, Illinois, or Wisconsin, because the Democratic challengers are virtually certain to win in these states.
  2. And don’t waste resources on Arkansas, Iowa, Kentucky and Ohio, because the Democratic challengers are almost certain to lose.
  3. Keep an eye on Indiana. It is likely that Democrat Evan Bayh will win, though he seems to be chewing through his earlier significant lead. The state has gotten redder since he left the Senate in 2011 with a serious war chest, which he is deploying here.
Heidi's Top 7 Senate Candidates
Where to Concentrate Your $ and Time


My Top 7 candidates are listed in rank order based on how likely the candidate is to win, as of October 13, 2016. (A more complete challenger list in 15 states follows.)

1. NH Maggie Hassan
Governor of New Hampshire
Special note:  Both parties have poured so much money into this small state that donations may not be half as useful here as volunteering. Race: Some polls put Hassan ahead; others the incumbent Ayotte.  Popular governor vs. popular senator.  Ayotte has recently withdrawn support for Trump; will write in Pence. Key positions: Hassan lists just about everything on her site. The first four are combating opioid crisis; national security; economy, jobs and innovation; education and workforce development.   HF note: Have heard her speak three times; she is likeable and an accomplished governor.  Website: maggiehassan.com To volunteer: http://act.maggiehassan.com/page/s/web_form_volunteer?&source=web_form_volunteer

2. PA Katie McGinty
Former chief of staff to PA governor
Race: McGinty has been slightly behind but is climbing.  Key positions:  protecting environment (worked for both President Clinton and PA governor in key environmental roles); jobs and economy; education; affordable health care; women’s and LGBT rights, protecting SS and Medicare.  HF note:  Have heard twice, once at an event where she was backed by VP Biden. Attractive and vigorous.  Website: katiemcginty.com. Make check to:  Katie McGinty for US Senate and mail to Katie McGinty for US Senate, PO Box 22447, Philadelphia, PA 19110 To volunteer:  katiemcginty.com/volunteer/.

3. NV Catherine Cortez Masto
Former Nevada Attorney General
Race: running to replace Harry Reid, and has his machine behind her, but is about tied with opponent Congressman and Brigadier General Joe Heck, though she is rising.  Key positions: overturning Citizens United; raising minimum wage; protecting Medicare and Social Security; comprehensive immigration reform. As AG she fought meth labs, sex and human trafficking, predatory lending and aggressive foreclosures, scams against seniors. HF note: Have heard her once; impressive. Website: catherinecortezmasto.com. Mail check to: Catherine Cortez Masto for Senate, 8020 South Rainbow Blvd., Las Vegas, Nevada, 89139. To volunteer:  http://catherinecortezmasto.com/contact. Large Filipino population, so tagalog as well as Spanish is useful here. 

4. NC Deborah Ross
Former State Congresswoman
Race: Incumbent opponent ahead but unpopular; Ross not well known, hence volunteering is very important, and her head of volunteers, Sandra Johnson, is superb.  Key positions: for building infrastructure; women’s economic issues (e.g. minimum wage, equal pay and Social Security); solving student loan crisis; gun background checks; LGBTQ rights.  Also for protecting seniors and veterans and overturning Citizens United.  HF note:  have hosted a fundraiser and heard her speak elsewhere and met with her at length as well. Extremely impressive, poised, thoughtful. Website: deborahross.com  Make check to: Deborah Ross for Senate and mail to P O Box 28258, Raleigh, NC 27611. Contribute on-line to https://secure.actblue.com/contribute/page/drev160919

5. MO Jason Kander
Missouri Secretary of State
Race: slightly behind incumbent Roy Blunt Key positions:  Advocating for women and African Americans; government accountability; environmental protection; support for small businesses; early childhood education. Wants constitutional amendment requiring a balanced budget (!), which strikes me as a far-right, ill-advised fantasy. However as it will never pass, his other qualities make him a standout.    HF note: have heard once. Impressive, young candidate. Website: jasonkander.com Make check to:  Missourians for Kander and mail to Missourians for Kander, PO Box 548, Columbia, MO 65205. To volunteer: http://go.jasonkander.com/page/s/join-jason.

6. FL Congressman Patrick Murphy
Race:  This is such an important state that effort and money are worth it, even though Murphy is consistently seen as behind Marco Rubio, and this is the one close Senate race in which the Republicans have a bigger tv-ad war chest than the Democrats: $9.6 v. $4.2 million. However, Rubio has only 44%, not 50%; Clinton has a slight edge in the state; and Obama has done tv ads for both Hillary and Murphy, including in Spanish. Key positions:  growing the middle class; immigration reform; protecting voting rights; strengthening Social Security and Medicare. HF note:  no personal contact.  [JTM note: Alice and I have attended at least one fundraiser for him and found him to be fiscally knowledgable and alert, and socially liberal; he was the youngest person in the Congress when he was first elected; he has been elected twice with 60% of the vote in a GOP-leaning district.] Website:  www.murphyforflorida.com.  Make check to: Murphy for Florida. Mail to: Murphy for Florida, 4521 PGA Blvd #412,  Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33418

7. AZ Ann Kirkpatrick, Arizona Congresswoman 
Special note: Ann Kirkpatrick seriously lags John McCain in most polls. Also, not only does he have universal name recognition, but, because of his Senate seniority, through his committee assignments he controls a lot of benefits for Arizona. 

However, I am such a fan of Ann Kirkpatrick herself, her broad and well-organized campaign on the ground, and her money-raising team that her race is listed here as one to support. 

And she has some new advantages. McCain has said he will veto any Hillary Supreme Court nominee, which is bound to hurt him. Hillary is making a major push to take this Red State, with Michelle Obama campaigning for her there. Ann raised $3 million in the 3rd quarter. At the very least, help to her now can tee up another run in 2018, when Jeff Flake’s seat will be up.

Key positions: pro choice, pro LGBTQ rights, fighter for veterans, paid maternity leave, immigration reform, Affordable Care Act. HF note:  We have met twice at length, plus I gave a fundraiser for her, and was on the host committee for a second, so I have a good feel for her. Sweet, shrewd, down-to-earth, honest, compassionate. The word people at both fundraisers used most often to characterize her was “impressive.” Website: kirkpatrickforsenate.com  Donate online at https://secure.actblue.com/contribute/page/akesplash?recurring=true&refcode=website
Make check to: Kirkpatrick for Senate and mail to Kirkpatrick for Senate, PO Box 34421, Phoenix, AZ 8506 To volunteer:  http://www.kirkpatrickforsenate.com/landing/volunteer/


15 Dem Challengers
In State Alphabetic Order

Dem Challengers are seeking to fill a Republican-held or vacant seat.

Table Column Headings
  • C or O? Challenger, or Open seat? (“Open” means the incumbent is not running)
  • DSCC: Endorsed by the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, which backs candidates in races they think are important, and winnable but not sure, hence where money is likely to have the most impact.
  • EMILY’s List: Endorsed by EMILY’s List
  • DFA: Endorsed by Democracy for America, whose candidates tend to be very progressive. (DFA backed Bernie for President.)

How to Donate: ActBlue or Check?
If you like donating frequently with small amounts, then ActBlue and other intermediaries are useful in reducing the administrative burden for campaigns of taking credit card charges and having to comply with reporting requirements for gifts. The greater frequency of small donations allows for faster feedback to candidates on how they are doing. However, donating by check keeps your email address more private and more of your money gets to the candidate without the haircuts taken by your credit card company and ActBlue.

Friday, August 5, 2016

CAMPAIGN$ | Giving to Senate Races (Superseded)

This post is kept up to maintain links. It is superseded by this one: http://cityeconomist.blogspot.com/2016/10/campaign-tips-for-dem-control-of-senate.html